A Dorky, Disillusioned Da Vinci Code 
Reviewed by Brian Quale
June 27th, 2007

Experience life through the eyes of Tom Henderson: surviving in a high school full of, in his words, “psychotic normal people,” while trying to get his band together, and attempting to decipher cryptic clues he discovers in his deceased father’s stack of old books. Portman’s first novel is a witty, humorous, music-centric, and fun read.
The cover of Frank Portman’s first novel takes the old, classic red cover of The Catcher in the Rye and symbolically replaces Holden’s catcher fantasy title (using the eraser and pen method) with Tom’s self-imposed and self-deprecating nickname: King Dork. This publishing decision would suggest that this Young Adult Novel is simply a modern retelling of Holden Caulfield’s escape from prep. school and wandering around New York for a couple days, but this is far from the case. Portman’s novel, although influenced by The Catcher and referenced throughout (usually with disdain) by Tom, is an original, creative and sophisticated work that makes Salinger’s book seem even more dated than it already is. Tom is the Catcher Cult’s Antichrist but, at the same time, Holden’s postmodern alter ego who has an intriguing story to tell, and who makes a very solid and captivating first effort.
Our narrator Tom is an almost-friendless, fairly disillusioned teenager with severe Nick Hornby a-la High Fidelity tendencies. He is quick to reference his predominantly 70’s music catalog, considers The Who “the greatest band in the world,” and is constantly inspired by his day-to-day interactions to create new conceptual names, identities, and album art for his two member band. For example:
Band Name: Oxford English
Guitar: Moe Bilalabama
Bass and Lollygagging: Sam “the Cat” Hellerman
First Album: What Part of Suck Don’t You Understand?
Public education, in Tom’s world, is having to endure “the monotony of standard, generic High School Hell, which somehow manages to be horrifying and tedious at the same time.” He considers it “the penalty for transgressions yet to be specified,” and based on some of his experiences that he narrates, the transgressions are quite severe. PE is a “little foretaste of our fine prison system” that includes a boxing unit, where the teacher organizes grudge matches between students, and the fights only end when someone bleeds. “Functionally illiterate” vice principals find ways to torment everyone they can, and Mr. Schtuppe’s English class, which Tom describes figuratively as an “educational train wreck in progress,” spends most of the semester on useless assignments like copying a chapter from The Catcher in the Rye, defining all the words with three or more syllables, and then using them in sentences.
In many ways Tom’s world mirrors Holden’s, which is plagued with seemingly clueless adults, backstabbing classmates, out-of-touch teachers, and in general, dare I say it, “phonies.” Tom also exhibits some classic Holden-esque preoccupations and tendencies. For example, he oftentimes compares his own life experiences to TV sit-coms or movies, specifically the teen movie genre, and dissects how what he is describing in “real” life relates to how Hollywood does it. He also describes how he tries to resist dressing with a specific genre and persona in mind, which he finds very easy to categorize at Hillside High. There are the real and fake mods, the fake hippies, the drama hippies, the young sports troglodytes-in-training, the stoners, the stoner stoners, and the psychotic normal people, who are the closest a group comes on campus to pure evil incarnate. For Tom’s own style, he settles for a military surplus jacket, black converse, and clothes that are generally “unaffiliated,” besides T-shirts of rock bands. Sorry, no red hunting hat for Tom.
At times, it seems like King Dork replaces the cliché’s of high school with other, more updated ones that are oftentimes found in the very movies that Tom criticizes. Parts reminded me of the atmosphere created by the exaggerated school scenes from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off intended to remind us of what Ferris is avoiding, where Ben Stein is your econ. teacher who spends twenty minutes taking roll with his monotonous drone, and then unleashes into an unbearable lesson on “Vooodoooooo Econoooooomics.” But maybe this is part of the fun, and maybe I am being naïve about the modern day high school student experience. I am, after all, a high school teacher. Other parts of the novel concerning the mysteries and conspiracies Tom is working to solve turn into a combination of high school detective noir movies like the underappreciated Brick, and drugged-out suburbia movies like the recent Chumscrubber or Thumbsucker (and I assume a slew of other average three-syllable movies that end in –er).
Nevertheless, Tom has a captivating story to tell that happens within the course of a school semester. It is not a story simply of survival, but of reading and piecing together clues found in his deceased father’s stack of counterculture classics that he read in the early 60’s—The Catcher in the Rye, The Seven Storey Mountain, The Doors of Perception, Siddhartha—to name a few. While the wildly successful conspiracy thriller The Da Vinci Code has characters searching for hidden messages that hold clues to understanding Christianity better (from what I’ve been told—I haven’t read the book, or seen the movie with “Amelie” and a mulleted Tom Hanks), Tom Henderson’s more personal hope, which becomes the reader’s as well, is to find closer connections to his father’s past in order to get to know his father better, albeit retroactively. One wonders as you become involved with Toms’ life, including his new experiences with the opposite sex, if he will ever get to the bottom of these mysteries.
Portman has fun with Tom’s narration, which creates a pseudo-reality that is mesmerizing and engrossing. It is a story told in retrospection, much like Salinger does with Holden. We never learn about Tom’s writing abilities (besides the proof of the well-written book itself), but he often shares his regrets with the reader that he did not keep more accurate notes to help him retell his experiences, and he admits that the timeline of his story is “fuzzy.” Like most novels that would fall under the classification of Young Adult Literature, King Dork is also a strong example of the effective use of teenage skaz (first person narration with the characteristics of spoken rather than the written word), much like The Catcher, although Tom’s narration is much more sophisticated, exhibiting his wit and insight, whereas Holden oftentimes comes off as clueless and whiny. As far as the diction of our narrators, Holden’s innocent use of words such as “crummy” and “phony” are replaced by Tom with cringe-worthy adjectives like “gay” and “retarded,” but with effectiveness that does not glorify their usage, but uses them honestly as part of the unfortunate slang lexicon of teenagers (and many an adult).
Do you have to have read The Catcher to enjoy this novel? I don’t think so—it seems like experiencing public education might be enough, but it would help if you has a taste of the phenomenon that Tom refers to as the “Catcher Cult,” which is the worshiping of Salinger’s novel by teachers and students alike. He references a couple parts of the novel that might spoil a first reading, so I would recommend reading The Catcher first if you were planning on it. And, if you happen to be a high school student living in the United States, plan on reading it in school if you have not already, because chances are you will.
Chuck Klosterman (pop culture/80’s metal critic,) whimsically defines the last five to ten years as the “era of predictable disillusionment.” Our self-awareness of how we should feel when, in a way, has gotten to the point where feelings of disillusionment and alienation are now anticipated, and oftentimes prescribed. I think Portman’s novel and narrator offer something that is much needed and refreshingly new to combat this tendency, or at least make it less predictable, while at the same time drawing on our American Lit. tradition. There are enough Holdens and Holden wannabes in this world, and it’s due time for a Tom or two.
King Dork was published by Delacorte Books for Young Readers. Frank Portman, according to the dust jacket, is the singer / songwriter / guitarist for the Bay Area band The Mr. T Experience, which I recall not being cool enough to listen to in high school. He has finished a new novel, possibly titled Andromeda Klein. Check out his website for more information, and check out Patrick’s review of King Dork for another point of view.

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }
I feel like a total loser for being the only one (to my knowledge) posting a comment on the review, but I’m just going to say that I really appreciated the Ferris Bueller reference. I think I saw this title while I was browsing borders.com but this review has reminded me that I still need to get my hands on it. :]
Well somebody’s got to be first Sam.
Well somebody’s got to be first Sam. I’m cognizant of the fact that we’ve yet to discuss the multitude of idiosyncrasies portrayed by Holden’s character, but I think it’s a shame that Tom provides negative references of Catcher. I’ve read the Book Review Info as well as this review, and in the criteria it stated we weren’t allowed to exceed 700 words. Is this particular review longer though? *Tasteful description of Tom Hanks by the way*
Well, seeing that the review was written by Quale I’d say he can probably take a few liberties with the word count, Alex. ;]
Unless of course you plan on grading him. Haha.
That is one long but thorough review/analysis of the book.
High Fidelity style!? how delicious
Those people that are way too protective of their music and constantly rate songs (michael…) always make for a good story.
The part at the end – where disillusionment is anticipated these days is so incredibly true. Makes me really want to read it.
You, Alex, are one of the catcher cult. I’m 31 years old and read the book for the first time last year, prior to reading “King Dork”, call it homework if you will. Simply put, I didn’t like it, probably due to the ending more than anything. I went on to read different analysis of the book by teachers, professors and Joes, but I feel that they missed the point of the book. Holden Caulfield was like a great majority of kids I went to school with, you went to school with, whoever is reading your blog went to school with and most likely even Salinger went to school with, they’re timeless. These kids hate everyone and everything, wallow in self misery and brood about doing or even not doing things they will regret later on in life. Holden’s problem is not that he was picked on, bullied or abused like many other kids, it’s that he can’t get over the death of his little brother, that he feels somewhat responsible and feels like he could’ve, should’ve done something about it. MANY people feel this way when losing a loved one, especially a child. Salinger’s story was great except when he had Holden committed to the sanitarium. Isn’t that a bit extreme? I know they had counciling and therapy in the 40s.
Frank’s book is written in a different way, but about a kid with similar problems to Holder, just replace a brother with a father and make the kid not all that shook up about it but being genuinely abused and made miserable by peers and bullies. Sure he winds up in a hospital in the end and Holden is in the sanitarium but their journeys to get to those points were much different. Tom and Sam have a victory, things look brighter in their future while Holden is locked away in the looney bin. Also, it appears that Frank took great measures to make his story not be as dated in 40 years as “Catcher” is. Sure he makes MANY references to music in the 60s and 70s, but that was 20-30 years in Tom’s past and he makes it known that the music he refers to is old, but does not date the time in which KD takes place, although he has said it is in the mid 90s. There is no mention of the internet, cell phones or any other technology to date the book. It could very well take place anywhere from 1970-unforseeable future date. I know you gave it a good rating, but I think you may have severely underestimated it.
You should also appreciate where the book came from, a college educated guy in Oakland, who for the last 30 years has been writing and playing in his “dumb little band”, traveling the world playing small to medium venues, being one of rock’s most brilliant and yet most ignored and unappreciated lyracists. Then amongst doing all of that, writing a book for the first time and having it be this good and sell this well, is utterly astounding.
Well, that’s all I have to say about that……..
Indeed, “Andromeda Klein” is coming next, followed by a sequel of sorts “King Dork: Approximately”. Subscribe to his blog, he’s a great guy, it’s a fun read. If you’re ever in Oakland, he’ll probably even have a beer with you.
Mr. Quale, I would like to borrow this sometime in the very near future. I would also very much like to borrow “Sex, Drugs, and Cocoa Puffs”. Thank you very much.
I really appreciated King Dork. Except for the instrument playing (I have no talent in this area), Tom’s life felt a little too familiar. As a guy who still gets no action long after high school, I felt the resolution of the novel was appropriate to the story as told. Tom and Sam didn’t win the band competition (they were not good enough), but they did become appreciated for the way their songs distilled the essence of life in their high school. The band names and song titles rocked (mostly). Can’t wait for the movie. Alyson Michalka should play Celeste Fletcher/Fiona.
I also did not like King Dork. You would think after all the crap in Tom’s life he would be trying to do something good, maybe put a little more light into the dark world that surrounds him. But instead Frank Portman just keeps having tom desperatly trying to fulfill shallow pleasures. He portrays sex as a “Happily Ever After” ending. When in reality messing around with TWO (kinda slutty girls with who knows what diseases) at the same time has never turned out good for anybody. How is that supposed to relieve his guilt? I think it Frank Portman put a little more insight into life and consequences instead of trying to remix Catcher in the Rye King Dork had a great premise and could have been a good book.